您现在的位置: 净心之旅,传统文化,国学讲座,禅修,辟谷,养生,禅文化,中医,文化交流,道家,禅商,儒释道讲座,佛文化,儒家文化,雅集,大师讲座,身心净化,会议会展,企业培训,年会策划,禅道商道,禅与企业管理,古琴,茶道,梵呗,道德经,知行合一,佛禅文化,禅修内观,佛法讲座,企业文化,企业家禅修,Silk Road,meditation,Kungfu,culture,tea >> 世界文化遗产 >> 丝绸之路
  分类导航 Class
丝绸之路
Silk Road
石窟壁画艺术
Grotto Mural Arts
世界奇迹大观
World Wonders
亚非世界文化遗产
Asia & Africa
欧美世界文化遗产
Europe/America
世界非物质文化遗产
Non-material Culture
  文化艺术交流项目
01
重走西行路-玄奘大师西行东归国内段(长安-秦州-凉州-安西-伊吾-白力城-高昌-龟兹-于阗...
02
Master Xuanzang’s footprint in China (Chang’an-Qinzhou-Liangzhou-Anxi-Yiwu-Bai...
03
2018年禅文化/企业家禅修/国学讲座/禅修净心/道家养生/中医辟谷/佛艺雅集及世界儒释道...
04
石窟壁画艺术-龙门+云岗+麦积山+炳灵寺+莫高窟+柏兹克里克+吐峪沟+克孜尔+森姆塞姆石窟...
05
九华山排毒养生-大德开示-禅修净心4星级酒店(净心之旅国际文化010-59796156)
06
Mahayana Buddhism first entered China through Silk Road
07
Astrological Explanation of Inedia/Breatharianism
08
如何在生活和工作中运用《金刚经》之“应无所住而生其心”
09
欧洲文化艺术精华-博物馆美术馆全覆盖(德国-法国-意大利-梵蒂冈-奥地利-荷兰-比利时)美...
10
诚征中医理疗养生合作单位-针对欧美人(推拿按摩,针灸,拔罐,刮痧等)
11
重走玄奘大师西行路禅文化交流
12
2017年禅文化/企业家禅修/国学讲座/禅修净心/道家养生/中医辟谷/佛艺雅集及世界儒释道...
13
玄奘大师西行路/桑奇佛塔/阿旃陀石窟/内观体验
14
中华传统武术-少林功夫及传统文化体验课程
15
柬埔寨吴哥、金边6天5晚 文化交流+禅修之旅
16
关于净心优秀传统文化艺术讲堂
17
禅修养生:参禅打坐, 修身养性
18
公益行-相约九华山佛学讲座+禅修+朝山净心之旅4天
更多...

The Case for Rebuilding the Bamiyan Buddhas to Their Original Glory
来源:净心之旅 更新日期: 2017-1-31 浏览次数: 1407 字号选择:  




Buddhistdoor View: The Case for Rebuilding the Bamiyan Buddhas to Their Original Glory

By Buddhistdoor
Buddhistdoor Global | 2017-01-27 | 
A girl watches over her sheep and goats as they graze before one of the destroyed Bamiyan Buddhas. From wsj.comA girl watches over her sheep and goats as they graze before one of the destroyed Bamiyan Buddhas. From wsj.com


After a long and difficult journey across the precipices and through the blizzards of the Tian Shan mountain ranges, Xuanzang (fl. c. 602–64) finally reached the town of Bamiyan in modern-day Afghanistan. His celebrated pilgrimage to India was one of astonishing tenacity, aided by the protection of bodhisattvas from the forces of nature, and on this leg of his journey Xuanzang arrived in a valley separating the Hindu Kush from its western extension, the Koh-i-baba. 


The residents of Bamiyan, according to the Chinese monk, wore furs and rough woolen clothes, and made a living growing spring wheat, flowers, and fruit, and herding cows, horses, and sheep. The people had coarse, uncultivated manners, but Xuanzang admired their simple and sincere religious faith, which they expressed by carving two colossal Buddha images into the rocky northeastern hill overlooking their settlements (a third reclining Buddha recorded in Xuanzang’s journal has yet to be found).


It is not known when the affectionately bestowed nicknames for the larger Buddha, Salsal (“light shines throughout the universe”), and Shamama (“Queen Mother”) for the smaller image, came into use. Historian Mahmud ibn Wali of Balkh (b. c. 1004 or 1095) wrote in his hagiography Bahr al-Asrar: “One cannot believe that there were made by human hands.” Frédéric Bobin of Le Monde put it quite well: “For 15 centuries the two mystic colossi gazed down as the trading caravans and warring armies streamed past. Monks came from China to worship here. 


Others meditated in nearby caves.” (The Guardian) Until they were desecrated and destroyed by the Taliban in 2001, the Bamiyan Buddhas inspired Buddhist, Christian, and Muslim observers alike, with one mullah (who no doubt represented the tolerant Islamic community in Bamiyan) lamenting, “The statues symbolised Bamiyan.” (The Guardian)


The Alliance for the Restoration of Cultural Heritage (ARCH)* supports full restoration of the Bamiyan Buddhas and has carried out a rigorous study of eight options for rebuilding them. This is a proposal that makes many conservators at UNESCO blanch. It was UNESCO that declared in 2011 that the statues would be best remembered by their absence. “


The two niches should be left empty, like two pages in Afghan history, so that subsequent generations can see how ignorance once prevailed in our country,” said Zamaryalai Tarzi, a Franco-Afghan archaeologist. (The Guardian) This is the dominant school of conservation at Bamiyan, which has been the victim of continuous political wrangling from different organizations and experts. Official UNESCO policy is based on the 1964 Venice Charter, which demands that “original material” be used for the conservation and restoration of monuments and sites, and if this rule is disregarded, there is the threat of UNESCO striking the site off its World Heritage List.



<i>The Colossal Idols at Bameean</i> by Alexander Burnes, 1834, with dark incisions as caves. From columbia.eduThe Colossal Idols at Bameean by Alexander Burnes, 1834, with dark incisions as caves. From columbia.edu


However, after a long dialogue with ARCH and consulting Professor S. Frederick Starr, a distinguished expert on Eurasian affairs and history, we also believe that there is a sound rationale for full restoration.


The hesitation to reconstruct the images betrays a Eurocentric prejudice that has dominated UNESCO for too long, and ARCH’s report argues that a full restoration of the Buddha images would go a long way to restoring the faith of many people in the organization’s professedly unbiased assessment protocol, such as that of Michael Petzet of the German branch of the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS), who has made multiple statements in support of rebuilding at least Shamama. 


Lauren Bursey argued in 2014 that the Afghan administration felt that rebuilding the statues would be a symbolic triumph over the Taliban, and that Afghans saw not doing so as depriving future generations of the opportunity to see them.


The Eurocentric perspective is also evident in the priorities given to the nine criteria that UNESCO uses to determine a site or monument’s heritage value: design, material, workmanship, setting, traditions, techniques, language, intangible heritage, and spirit and feeling. 


The first three clearly betray a preference for “objectivity” based on the rationalist values of European art. At the end of the day, rationalism alone cannot reflect the non-material values of a Buddhist site: in Asia (the continent to which these carvings belonged before they were destroyed) building materials are often more transient, such as wood, unbaked clay, or stucco that formed the Buddhas’ robes.


The role of a locale for ritual purposes and its ties to antiquity or a meaningful event are much more important than the question of whether a commemorative or ritual structure, or its components, are “original.” While the Buddhas at Bamiyan were made primarily from stone, it is their location, in the heart of old Bactria and at the crossroads of civilizations such as the Hellenic world, old India, and China, that makes even the blasted cavities of the destroyed statues holy.



A defaced cave overlooking the Bamiyan valley. From wikimedia.orgA defaced cave overlooking the Bamiyan valley. From wikimedia.org


Asian conservation philosophy focuses on the intangible significance of a site rather than material or tangible “stuff,” and the relationship between the landscape itself and the monument, while UNESCO’s approach focuses disproportionately on the latter. 


Indeed, one might say that this attitude has divorced the structures of the Buddhas from the site at which they were carved—and this is untenable from the Buddhist perspective, where the “spirit of the land” matters much more. Language, intangible heritage, and spirit and feeling were only added as UNESCO conservation categories in 2005.


The idea that the holiness (or even the restorability) of a historical monument or site has an endpoint, after which they should not be touched again, is arbitrary and unfair. It is not as if Europe’s most beloved heritage sites have not undergone extensive and large-scale restoration over the centuries. 


During the Second World War, German cities such as Dresden, Hanover, Worms, and many more were obliterated. In the immediate aftermath of the war, their historic buildings were piles of rubble, but today these structures, from neighborhoods to concert halls and cathedrals, have been unapologetically restored. Why should it not be the same for Buddhist structures, if the local community deems it desirable? 


“I strongly support the idea of restoring the Buddhas to their original status,” Prof. Starr said when Buddhistdoor Global contacted him about the Bamiyan Buddhas. “This would be the best way to repudiate those who twice tried to destroy them—first in the 8th century and then again in the 20th century. They would stand as symbols of tolerance in modern Afghanistan.” 


A statement of Bamiyan’s broadmindedness would surely boost the cultural image of Afghanistan, where decades of political upheaval, economic difficulty, and foreign invasions have given it an unrepresentative image of cultural backwardness and Islamism. This enlightened attitude could even be said to be the “spirit” of Bamiyan, where few women wear burkas and 40 per cent of the girls are in school, the highest proportion in the country.


Finally, we should not overlook the considerable economic potential that restoring the Bamiyan Buddhas could represent. As recently as 2015, the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) named it a capital of culture, a designation that did not amount to much at all, according to the Germany- and Afghanistan-based Afghanistan Analysts Network (AAN), an independent think-tank. 


This designation should have been accompanied by events such as photo and painting exhibitions, traditional musical performances, a handicrafts bazaar, a food show, a literary and film festival, and more. But according to AAN, the initiatives all failed due to regional instability, insecure roads, an undersized airport, and the inability to drum up adequate international interest.


 While it is truly dismaying that “none of the 40 or so promised development projects have been implemented” (Afghanistan Analysts Network), full restoration of the Buddhas could be an important contribution to the overall restoration and reform of Bamiyan’s infrastructure and potential as a cultural hub and an economic asset.



Remnants of cave paintings in the monastic center of Bamiyan. From wikimedia.orgRemnants of cave paintings in the monastic center of Bamiyan. From wikimedia.org


Conservators and international organizations should look at restoring the Bamiyan Buddhas through the rubrics of fidelity to Asian standards of conservation, the restoration of cultural pride for local residents, and the potential for a corresponding economic revival in the area.


 Just as the land itself should not be divorced from the restoration of a landmark or monument, the Buddhas should not be considered apart from the context of Bamiyan’s future and the flourishing of its resilient people.


* ARCH is a non-profit organization committed to the promotion and defense of culture marred by crisis and war. In addition to the Bamiyan Buddhas and other projects, it has devoted resources to saving Pavlopetri, an ancient underwater city in Greece, collaborating with other institutions to protect Syria’s heritage, and helping to design a garden as celebrated in Rumi’s poetry in Kabul University (akin to the Shakespeare Garden in the Brooklyn Botanical Garden).




上一篇:3. Deserts--Silk Road “Themes”
下一篇:Conserving v. Rebuilding Afghanistan’s Bamiyan Buddhas

首页 | 联系我们 | 公益合作 | 商务合作 | 其他业务 | 版权声明 | 申请链接
北京办公室:010-59796156 西安办公室:029-89396276
新疆办公室:0991-2671466 河南办公室:13937187005
QQ: 2304721043 1047423912 
邮箱:eileen@188.com bailimei@188.com
Copyright (C) 2015-2035 净心之旅(北京)国际文化交流有限公司
jingxinzhilv.net 净心之旅.net
备案/许可证:京ICP备15038525号-1